Cover of: Reducing regulatory mandates on education | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. Subcommittee on Human Resources Read Online
Share

Reducing regulatory mandates on education hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, June, 12, 1997. by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. Subcommittee on Human Resources

  • 314 Want to read
  • ·
  • 84 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office in Washington .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • United States,
  • United States.

Subjects:

  • Federal aid to education -- United States -- States.,
  • Mandates -- United States -- States.,
  • Government spending policy -- United States.

Book details:

Classifications
LC ClassificationsKF27 .G663 1997t
The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 83 p. ;
Number of Pages83
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL3357092M
ISBN 10016056056X
LC Control Number2004398790
OCLC/WorldCa38569111

Download Reducing regulatory mandates on education

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

The Department of Education's regulatory efforts are guided in part by two recent Executive orders. Executive Order , "Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs," is part of the Administration's effort to manage the costs of compliance with Federal this Executive order, for each new significant regulatory action a Federal agency takes, that agency must.   The key to reducing regulatory burden for financial planners and financial advisors is the harmonization of regulatory requirements across sectors and regions. Specifically, financial planners are giving holistic advice for their clients’ needs that span across various regulatory regimes in insurance, securities, mutual funds and exempt products. Higher Education Regulation. Reducing Regulatory Burden; While some higher education regulations are well intentioned and implemented for valid accountability purposes, many of these higher education regulations are not consistent across federal agencies, and/or are inappropriately applied to universities or are out of proportion to the. Reducing regulatory mandates on education: hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, June, 12, , United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. Subcommittee on Human.

On Janu , President Trump issued E.O. , “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” (82 FR , February 3, ). E.O. provides that “it is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations.”.   EXECUTIVE ORDER – – – – – – – REDUCING REGULATION AND CONTROLLING REGULATORY COSTS. By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States. This could include consolidating regulators with similar missions and more clearly defining regulatory mandates. Increased accountability for all regulators can be achieved through oversight by an appointed board or commission or, in the case of a director-led agency, appropriate control and oversight by the Executive Branch, including the. The regulatory dilemma is this: On the one hand, regulation can be critically important to our welfare. Federal and state regulatory agencies have contributed to great improvements in air and water quality, highway safety, public health, honest commerce, racial and gender equality, and many other central aspects of American life.

In its report on patient safety, the Institute of Medicine recommended a nationwide mandatory reporting system to collect standardized information about adverse events. Efforts at instituting a national system have stalled, and both State legislatures and private or quasi-regulatory organizations have highlighted systemic breakdowns as being chiefly responsible for the “safety. proposals, news coverage, and regulatory enforcement. However, no federal, state or metro-area ambient standards exist for air toxics. As a result, it is difficult to know the concentration of toxics in our airshed. Behavior and policy change will require effective public education. News coverage and public education has been haphazard.   Much of the proposed legislation imposes un-funded mandates on employers and decreases worker job opportunity and flexibility. While this session is now over, is going to be here quickly. Legislation that is often drafted in the interim between sessions should focus on reducing regulatory barriers to help small business create jobs and. The Order further mandates that the RRTF provide a progress report to the Secretary by no later than , detailing progress on (i) improving the implementation of regulatory reform initiatives and policies and (ii) identifying regulations for repeal, replacement, or.